Mareseatoatsanddoeseatoatsbutlittlelambseativy.

Thursday, January 29, 2004

Why the lack of interest in following up on the Florida election theft? Here is the reason. From The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (http://www.usccr.gov/) report on the 2000 elections. (http://www.usccr.gov/pubs/vote2000/report/main.htm)

The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights conducted an extensive public investigation of allegations of voting irregularities during the 2000 presidential election in Florida. The investigation, utilizing the Commission’s subpoena power, included three days of hearings, more than 30 hours of testimony, 100 witnesses, and a systematic review of more than 118,000 pages of pertinent documents.

Perhaps the most dramatic undercount in Florida’s election was the uncast ballots of countless eligible voters who were turned away at the polls or wrongfully purged from voter registration rolls.

While statistical data, reinforced by credible anecdotal evidence, point to widespread disenfranchisement and denial of voting rights, it is impossible to determine the extent of the disenfranchisement or to provide an adequate remedy to the persons whose voices were silenced in this historic election by a pattern and practice of injustice, ineptitude, and inefficiency.

Despite the closeness of the election, it was widespread voter disenfranchisement, not the dead-heat contest, that was the extraordinary feature in the Florida election. The disenfranchisement was not isolated or episodic. And state officials failed to fulfill their duties in a manner that would prevent this disenfranchisement.

The Commission does not adjudicate violations of the law, hold trials, or determine civil or criminal liability. Therefore, the recommendations that follow urge the U.S. Department of Justice and Florida officials to institute formal investigations based on the facts in this report to determine liability and to seek appropriate remedies.

The Commission is charged to “investigate allegations in writing under oath or affirmation relating to deprivations—(A) because of color, race, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin; or (B) as a result of any pattern or practice of fraud; of the right of citizens of the United States to vote and have votes counted. . . .” The Commission is also charged with reporting its findings to the President and Congress as appropriate. The uncontroverted evidence leads the Commission to the following findings and recommendations.


The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights found that there had been irregularities in the Florida vote and did what they could legally. They forwarded the findings to Ashcroft and to the state of Florida. At which point the process ended.

No comments: